The power of Logos in human rationality and its relevance in the modern era of science
Main Article Content
Abstract
The concept of the Logos in the Gospel of John has long been the subject of theological and philosophical discussions. In the era of modern science, questions have arisen about the relevance and relationship between this concept of the Logos and the development of science and human rationality. A hermeneutical approach is used to interpret the meaning of the Logos in historical and contemporary contexts. This study aims to explore the relationship between the concept of the Logos in the Gospel of John and the development of modern science, and to analyze how this understanding can bridge the gap between faith and rationality. The Logos in the Gospel of John is understood as the creative and rational principle underlying the universe, which is also manifested in Jesus Christ. There is a parallelism between the function of the Logos in creation and the role of human rationality in the development of science. The concept of the Logos offers a framework for integrating scientific progress with spiritual wisdom. This view challenges the dichotomy between science and faith, proposing that both realms an complement each other in understanding reality. The concept of the Logos in the Gospel of John has significant relevance in the era of modern science. It offers a holistic perspective that allows for the integration of scientific and spiritual understanding, encouraging a more comprehensive approach to knowledge and reality. This understanding has the potential to bridge the gap between faith and rationality, paving the way for a more constructive dialogue between religion and science.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Alinan, Inerles. “Makna Kata Λόγος Dalam Injil Yohanes 1: 1-18 Dan Praktek Λόγος Dalam Kehidupan Orang Kritesn Yang Percaya.” IAKN Toraja. Toraja, 2022.
Anselsmus of Canterbury. Proslogion. Teora, 1997.
Aryeh, Daniel Nii Aboagye. “The Purpose of Σημεῖα Καὶ Τέρατα in the Gospel of John: A Socio-Rhetorical Reading of John 4: 46-54.” Conspectus: The Journal of the South African Theological Seminary 32, no. 1 (2021): 110–24. https://doi.org/10.54725/conspectus.2021.2.6
Belay, Yosep. “Rekonstruksi Kristologi Logos Menjawab Tantangan Dekonstruksi Terma Logosentrisme Dalam Tinjauan Biblika.” CHARISTHEO: Jurnal Teologi Dan Pendidikan Agama Kristen 2, no. 1 (2022): 29–45. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.54592/jct.v2i1.37.
Betz, John R. Christ the Logos of Creation: An Essay in Analogical Metaphysics. Steubenville, Ohio: Emmaus Academis, 2023.
Boimau, Albertus O, Aben T Banamtuan, and Mozes Lawalata. “Memahami Konsep Ajaran Doketisme.” Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Dan Teologi 2, no. 2 (2024): 149–62. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.59581/jpat-widyakarya.v2i2.3069.
Brown, Raymond E. The Gospel According to John. New York: Doubleday, 1970.
Budiman, Arif. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif: Teori Dan Praktik. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada, 2020.
Bultmann, Rudolf. The Gospel of John: A Commentary. Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1971.
Costa, Tony. “The Use of Πιστεύω in the Gospel of John: Some Considerations on Meaning and Issues of Consistency and Ambiguity.” Conspectus: The Journal of the South African Theological Seminary 32, no. 1 (2021): 93–109. https://doi.org/10.54725/conspectus.2021.2.5.
Creswell, John W. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Los Angeles & London: SAGE Publications, 2014.
Davision, Andrew. Participation in God: A Study in Christian Doctrine and Metaphysics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2019.
Desta, Dagnachew. “The Transition from ‘Mythos’ to ‘Logos’: The Case of Heraclitus.” Athens Journal of Philosophy, 2023, 9–24. https://doi.org/10.30958/ajphil.2-1-1.
Fink, Arlene. Conducting Research Literature Reviews: From Paper to the Internet. Los Angeles & London: SAGE Publications, 2005.
Ford, David F. “The Gospel of John and Contemporary Society: Three Major Theological Contributions.” Religions 14, no. 11 (2023): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14111357.
Gea, Ibelala. “Allah Menjadi Manusia Sebuah Uraian Teologis.” KENOSIS: Jurnal Kajian Teologi 2, no. 2 (2016): 125–40. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37196/kenosis.v2i2.37.
Guthrie, Donald. Teologi Perjanjian Baru 1: Allah, Manusia, Kristus. Jakarta: BPK Gunung Mulia, 2011.
Hadiwijaya, A S. Tafsir Injil Yohanes. Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 2012.
Hagelberg, Dave. Tafsiran Injil Yohanes: Pasal 1-5. Yogyakarta: Andi, 2013.
Holmes, Arthur F. Segala Kebenaran Adalah Kebenaran Allah. Surabaya: Momentum, 2000.
Hought, John F. Science and Faith: A New Introduction. New York & Mahwa: Paulist Press, 2010.
Jonas, Hans. The Gnostic Religion. Boston: Beacon Press, 2001.
Kuhn, Thomas S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. London: University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2012.
Lomas, Tim. “Life Balance and Harmony.” International Journal of Wellbeing 11, no. 1 (2021): 50-68. https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v11i1.1477.
L. M., Yusuf. “Interpretasi Kata Logos Dan Theos Dalam Yohanes 1: 1.” BONAFIDE: Jurnal Teologi Dan Pendidikan Kristen 1, no. 1 (2020): 23–43. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.46558/bonafide.v1i1.1.
McGrath, Alister E. The Science of God: An Introduction to Scientific Theology. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2004.
Merwe, Dirk G Van der. “The Concept and Activity of ‘Obedience’ in the Gospel of John.” Verbum et Ecclesia 43, no. 1 (2022): 1–9. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/ve.v43i1.2367.
Ndima, R L M M. “Gereja Dan Tubuh Yang Terluka: Studi Hermeneutik Disabilitas Terhadap Narasi Penampakan Diri Yesus Dalam Injil Yohanes 20: 19-23.” Salatiga, 2021.
Olalekan, Otunaya Abdulazeez, and Kolawole Oladotun Paul. “The Relevance of John 1: 1-18 For Contemporary Christians.” Vidyajyoti Journal of Theological Reflection 85, no. 3 (2021): 38–51. https://www.academia.edu/88087953/The_Relevance_of_John_1_1_18_for_Contemporary_Christians
Panggabean, Lenny Susi R. “Kristologi Yohanes: Suatu Perlawanan Terhadap Kristologi Docetisme.” KERUGMA: Jurnal Teologi Dan Pendidikan Agama Kristen 6, no. 1 (2024): 15–26. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2500/kerugma.v6i1.145.
Platinga, Alvin. Warranted Christian Belief. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.
Pranoto, Minggus Minarto. “Perkembangan Doktrin Inkarnasi Kristus: Misteri Iman Dan Dasar Keselamatan Manusia.” Jurnal Abdiel: Khazanah Pemikiran Teologi, Pendidikan Agama Kristen Dan Musik Gereja 7, no. 2 (2023): 202–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37368/ja.v7i2.603.
Runesi, Yasintus T. “Fenomenologi: Logos Partisipatif Dan Tabernakel Semesta.” Lumen Veritatis: Jurnal Filsafat Dan Teologi 10, no. 2 (2020): 221–40. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30822/lumenveritatis.v10i2.479.
Sanders, C. Iman: Akali Dan Nir-Akali. Jakarta: BPK Gunung Mulia, 2004.
Schreiner, Thomas R. New Testament Theology. Yogyakarta: Andi, 2015.
Sihite, Franseda. “Kualifikasi Pengajar Alkitab Melawan Ajaran Sesat Anti-Tritunggal Berdasarkan 1 Timotius 4: 1-16.” Phronesis: Jurnal Teologi Dan Misi 6, no. 2 (2023): 319–31. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.47457/phr.v6i2.415.
Situmorang, Jonar. Kamus Alkitab Dan Theologi. Yogyakarta: Andi, 2016.
Tandaiassa, Samuel. Teologia Perjanjian Baru. Yogyakarta: Moriel Publishing House, 2010.
Wacome, Donald H. The Material Image: Reconciling Modern Science and Christian Faith. Lanham, Boulder, New York, & London: Lexington Books & Fortress Academic, 2020.
Wahono, S Wismoady. Disini Kutemukan. Jakarta: BPK Gunung Mulia, 2018.
Waqas, Syed M. “The Qur’ānic Dialogue with the Mystical Theology of Logos in John’s Gospel.” Teosofi: Jurnal Tasawuf Dan Pemikiran Islam 10, no. 2 (2020): 179–203.
Wen, Willyam. Logos, Memra Dan Yesus- Sebuah Studi Tentang Pengaruh Konsep Logos Yudaisme Helenisme, Memra Yudaisme Palestina Terhadap Konsep Logos Perjanjian Baru. Bekasi: Galilee Press, 2018.
Wyckoff, John W. Pneuma and Logos the Role of the Spirit in Biblical Hermeneutics. Eugene & Oregon: Wipf & Stock, 2015.